Republican State Leadership Committee We Can Change Congress
Home
Nov 22
Friday

Election Day 2010 proved to be an even bigger “wave” election at the state level than anticipated. Republicans flipped at least 19 legislative bodies to Republican control and hold majorities in 10 of the 15 states that will gain or lose U.S. House seats and where the legislature plays a role in redrawing the map.

Republicans have an opportunity to create 20-25 new Republican Congressional Districts through the redistricting process over the next five election cycles, solidifying a Republican House majority.

We could not have succeeded and cannot continue to succeed without your support – Join Us Today.

Newsflash:

Get Daily REDMAP Updates Directly to Your Inbox

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Facebook

REDMAP

Welcome to this week’s edition of REDMAP Rundown, a synopsis of redistricting news brought to you by the RSLC’s REDistricting MAjority Project (REDMAP). This weekly update gives you the latest on what those in the Beltway, and across the country, are saying about the impending reapportionment and redistricting process.

In this week’s REDMAP Rundown: Democrat darkness, Alabama’s handshake and the state legislative coattails of Obama and Blago.

Politics Daily’s Lou Cannon kicks off, writing, “Republicans are … optimistic about gaining seats in the 88 legislative chambers (of a total of 99) for which there are elections this year. These legislative elections will determine which party holds the upper hand in the 2011 congressional and legislative reapportionments that will be based on the 2010 census. Several legislative bodies are closely balanced, among them the Texas House, which Republicans control by a two-seat margin. Texas is the largest prize in the redistricting sweepstakes; it will gain four additional House seats (for a total of 36) because of population increases. Republicans are favored to hold the Texas House and are in no apparent danger of losing any other legislative body they now control. Democrats, in contrast, are playing defense in attempting to hold onto at least a dozen chambers. ‘It looks dark for the Democrats,’ says Tim Storey, a political analyst for the National Council of State Legislatures (NCSL). … Now, with the pendulum swinging back, Republicans stand to gain some 500 legislative seats.

“Republican candidates hoping to end Democratic dominance of the Alabama Legislature unveiled an agenda Monday,” according to The Associated Press. “House Minority Leader Mike Hubbard, who’s also chairman of the Alabama Republican Party, said all Republican candidates for the Legislature are supporting the ‘2010 Republican Handshake with Alabama,’ and its passage depends on Republicans taking control of the Legislature for the first time in 136 years. To try to accomplish that, GOP candidates are doing more than saying what they will do. Hubbard said they are tying Alabama Democrats to Washington to capitalize on voters’ uneasiness with the national economy and dislike of some new federal policies, particularly health care. ‘The Democrats in Alabama are no different than the Democrats in Washington. They have the same philosophy,’ said state Sen. Del Marsh, R-Anniston. Marsh, the GOP’s state finance chairman, was one of 17 legislative candidates who joined Hubbard to unveil the legislative agenda.”

“With less than three months until Election Day 2010, Republicans celebrated one of the most hard fought special elections – at any level – with the victory of Sam Blakeslee for California’s 15th Senate District. Blakeslee’s marks the 62nd state legislative special election victory for Republicans, nationwide, since President Barack Obama was elected. While Democrats hold a six-point voter registration advantage in the 15th District, Blakeslee topped Democrat John Laird 48 percent to 44 percent. The race, which was the determining factor in whether Democrats would be one step closer to achieving a super-majority in the senate, became a preview of Democrat efforts, drawing millions of dollars spent by liberal interests and heavy involvement from President Barack Obama.” Hotline On Call noted, “Here’s the rub: Dems outnumber Republicans 41% to 34% in the district and the Dem in the race – former Assemblyman John Laird – was backed by…wait for it..Pres. Obama. Blakeslee was backed by GOP Gov. nominee Meg Whitman.”

In Illinois, The Associated Press repots, “The unfinished business of the Blagojevich trial poses a major new hurdle for Illinois Democrats, who already are facing a difficult election season. After hoping Blagojevich’s trial would wrap up well before the November vote, a retrial could begin in the final weeks of campaigning. … Republicans are counting on voters to be angry about Blagojevich. The GOP says it won’t have to keep harping on him because voters will have plenty of reminders. ‘I think maybe in their minds they can say, I’ll send my own guilty verdict so to speak and my own message by voting for Republicans in the fall,’ said Illinois House Republican leader Tom Cross. ‘I don’t know that we need to say that. It’s not like Rod Blagojevich is going to be hiding in the back room over the next two months.’”

The RSLC is the only national organization whose mission is to elect down ballot state-level Republican office-holders. To sign up for the REDMAP Rundown, or for more information or media inquiries, please contact Adam Temple at 571.480.4891.

Last Updated on Tuesday, 24 August 2010 11:57

From American Prospect

In bad economic times, the electorate grows surly, and if “Throw the bums out!” is the prevailing mood, you’re in trouble if you’re one of the bums. That presents Democrats with a problem: They are the face of the political establishment not just nationally but in states as well.

Today, Democrats control 27 state legislatures, compared to the 14 Republicans control (eight are split, and Nebraska has a nonpartisan unicameral legislature). This was a dramatic turnaround from just a few years ago: In the previous three election cycles, Democrats gained a net of 374 state house seats and 68 state senate seats.

But that success has made them vulnerable, in much the same way as the gains made by congressional Democrats in 2006 and 2008 made them vulnerable. Democrats have to defend a lot of unsafe ground, including seats they managed to win in traditionally conservative districts. That makes for an unusually competitive year; according to Governing magazine’s Louis Jacobson, “Just under one-third (31 percent) of the legislative chambers that are up this fall are considered ‘in play’ — that is, rated tossup, lean Democratic or lean Republican. … Currently, the Democrats have 21 chambers in play, compared to just four for the Republicans — a burden five times as heavy for the Democrats.”

Read the rest…

Last Updated on Wednesday, 18 August 2010 08:39

REDMAP

Welcome to this week’s edition of REDMAP Rundown, a synopsis of redistricting news brought to you by the RSLC’s REDistricting MAjority Project (REDMAP).  This weekly update gives you the latest on what those in the Beltway, and across the country, are saying about the impending reapportionment and redistricting process.

In this week’s REDMAP Rundown: Republicans riding the wave, Oregon’s positioning, Holding the pen in Oklahoma, Growth in Texas, Interference in Mississippi and Cali’s new ideas.

“President Obama won every state that touches the Great Lakes as he marched toward the presidency, while Democrats picked up 10 Republican-held House seats in the region. But in politics, timing is everything, and now the GOP looks poised to make new gains in key races that could give Republicans a long-term toehold in a region that has trended away from them for the last decade,” reports The Hotline.  “The often overlooked state legislative landscape is in as much turmoil as federal races are this year. And with state legislators set to take up decennial redistricting over the next two years, Republicans have chosen exactly the right time to surf the electoral wave. … This year, the wave could wash over Great Lakes states and push half a dozen chambers into the GOP column. Republicans need to pick up just three seats to wrest control of the Indiana House; they need only four to take over the lower chamber in Ohio; two seats are all it would take to win the Wisconsin Senate; and four seats are necessary to win back the Wisconsin House. … ‘If it touches a Great Lake, it’s a good state for Republicans this year,’ [REDMAP Executive Director Chris] Jankowski said.”

“Republicans can take control of the 30-member Oregon State Senate if they are able to net four seats in the midterm elections,” according to this week’s Townhall.com spotlight.  “Even if they don’t win the upper chamber, getting closer to parity with the Democrats in the senate would give the Republicans a strong negotiating position with a friendly Governor.  In the 60-member Oregon House of Representatives, a GOP takeover is seven seats away.  Because Democrats currently have a super-majority, with slightly more than three-fifths of the seats on their side of the aisle, they don’t even need the Republicans to show up to pass bills at will.  Republicans are well positioned to not only end the Democrat super-majority, but also to retake the majority that Oregon Democrats captured during the 2006 mid-term elections.”

“Members were named Thursday to a House of Representatives Committee assigned to work on redrawing [Oklahoma] House and federal legislative districts using data from the 2010 census.  The Legislature, controlled by Republicans for the first time during the redistricting process, will take on the task next year of coming up with three sets of districts — one for the congressional seats, another for the state House and a third for the state Senate. It must be done every 10 years, by law, after the official U.S. Census Bureau figures are available.”

KFOX-TV reports, “Politicians across Texas gathered in El Paso on Monday for a hearing about redrawing the district lines in the state, a move that could cost El Paso a seat in the Texas House of Representatives. The House Redistricting Committee listened to concerns, but Rep. Joe Pickett who is a member of the committee, said nothing will be decided until the official numbers come out in February 2011 or April 2011. … He said since the state is growing, Texas may gain three or four seats in the U.S. Congress.”

“Both [Mississippi] lead legislators in the effort to redraw the state’s congressional and legislative districts say they want to accomplish the feat without judicial interference.  For them to accomplish their goal, they must get redistricting plans approved by a majority of both chambers of the Mississippi Legislature.”

“California voters have become all too familiar with the ferociously partisan, once-a-decade drawing of political boundaries. Even so, the 2010 election holds something new. Two wildly different measures targeting redistricting are on the ballot and an independent commission is poised to craft legislative districts for the first time.”

The RSLC is the only national organization whose mission is to elect down ballot state-level Republican office-holders. To sign up for the REDMAP Rundown, or for more information or media inquiries, please contact Adam Temple at 571.480.4891.

Last Updated on Tuesday, 17 August 2010 04:22

REDMAP

Welcome to this week’s edition of REDMAP Rundown, a synopsis of redistricting news brought to you by the RSLC’s REDistricting MAjority Project (REDMAP).  This weekly update gives you the latest on what those in the Beltway, and across the country, are saying about the impending reapportionment and redistricting process.

In this week’s REDMAP Rundown: Republicans riding the wave, Oregon’s positioning, Holding the pen in Oklahoma, Growth in Texas, Interference in Mississippi and Cali’s new ideas.

“President Obama won every state that touches the Great Lakes as he marched toward the presidency, while Democrats picked up 10 Republican-held House seats in the region. But in politics, timing is everything, and now the GOP looks poised to make new gains in key races that could give Republicans a long-term toehold in a region that has trended away from them for the last decade,” reports The Hotline.  “The often overlooked state legislative landscape is in as much turmoil as federal races are this year. And with state legislators set to take up decennial redistricting over the next two years, Republicans have chosen exactly the right time to surf the electoral wave. … This year, the wave could wash over Great Lakes states and push half a dozen chambers into the GOP column. Republicans need to pick up just three seats to wrest control of the Indiana House; they need only four to take over the lower chamber in Ohio; two seats are all it would take to win the Wisconsin Senate; and four seats are necessary to win back the Wisconsin House. … ‘If it touches a Great Lake, it’s a good state for Republicans this year,’ [REDMAP Executive Director Chris] Jankowski said.”

“Republicans can take control of the 30-member Oregon State Senate if they are able to net four seats in the midterm elections,” according to this week’s Townhall.com spotlight.  “Even if they don’t win the upper chamber, getting closer to parity with the Democrats in the senate would give the Republicans a strong negotiating position with a friendly Governor.  In the 60-member Oregon House of Representatives, a GOP takeover is seven seats away.  Because Democrats currently have a super-majority, with slightly more than three-fifths of the seats on their side of the aisle, they don’t even need the Republicans to show up to pass bills at will.  Republicans are well positioned to not only end the Democrat super-majority, but also to retake the majority that Oregon Democrats captured during the 2006 mid-term elections.”

“Members were named Thursday to a House of Representatives Committee assigned to work on redrawing [Oklahoma] House and federal legislative districts using data from the 2010 census.  The Legislature, controlled by Republicans for the first time during the redistricting process, will take on the task next year of coming up with three sets of districts — one for the congressional seats, another for the state House and a third for the state Senate. It must be done every 10 years, by law, after the official U.S. Census Bureau figures are available.”

KFOX-TV reports, “Politicians across Texas gathered in El Paso on Monday for a hearing about redrawing the district lines in the state, a move that could cost El Paso a seat in the Texas House of Representatives. The House Redistricting Committee listened to concerns, but Rep. Joe Pickett who is a member of the committee, said nothing will be decided until the official numbers come out in February 2011 or April 2011. … He said since the state is growing, Texas may gain three or four seats in the U.S. Congress.”

“Both [Mississippi] lead legislators in the effort to redraw the state’s congressional and legislative districts say they want to accomplish the feat without judicial interference.  For them to accomplish their goal, they must get redistricting plans approved by a majority of both chambers of the Mississippi Legislature.”

“California voters have become all too familiar with the ferociously partisan, once-a-decade drawing of political boundaries. Even so, the 2010 election holds something new. Two wildly different measures targeting redistricting are on the ballot and an independent commission is poised to craft legislative districts for the first time.”

The RSLC is the only national organization whose mission is to elect down ballot state-level Republican office-holders. To sign up for the REDMAP Rundown, or for more information or media inquiries, please contact Adam Temple at 571.480.4891.

Last Updated on Tuesday, 17 August 2010 04:22

From AP

Oklahoma’s incoming state House speaker named a steering committee on Thursday that will oversee the redrawing of state and federal legislative boundaries after the 2010 U.S. Census Bureau data is released.

House Speaker-designate Kris Steele appointed five Republicans and three Democrats, each from a different region of the state.

“We want to ensure that this process is bipartisan and fair as we construct appropriate districts to reflect the changing population of our state,” said Steele, R-Shawnee. “They represent a good cross-section of the state and are politically and geographically diverse.”

Read the rest

Last Updated on Friday, 13 August 2010 10:39

 

 

 

Home