Republican State Leadership Committee We Can Change Congress

Donate

Posts Tagged ‘2010’


From the Wall Street Journal.

Lose the battle but win the war—that is the redeeming hope congressional leaders offer to their rank-and-file members on the coming votes on the Obama health-care plan.

While diehards still insist that a government takeover of health care will be a net winner this fall, more and more Democrats understand this is a career-ending vote. And so their leadership presents them with the following proposition: Do the right thing and over the long run the power of our party will be stronger as the workers in roughly one-sixth of the U.S. economy will behave more like public employee union members.

Read the rest.

More
Last Updated on Friday, 19 March 2010 08:39

From R.G. Ratcliffe at the Houston Chronicle.

The U.S. Census forms arriving in Texans’ mailboxes next week will start the decennial dance over whether cities such as Houston or San Antonio get new seats in Congress through redistricting.

While the Census is nonpartisan, the redistricting process is highly political. How districts are drawn can determine whether they are competitive or are solidly Democratic or Republican.

Texas currently sends 20 Republicans and 12 Democrats to Congress. If the state gets four new seats, they likely will be split: two Republican and two Hispanic Democratic.

But the GOP also is likely to look for ways to reconfigure the districts of Democrats Chet Edwards of Waco and Lloyd Doggett of Austin to make it difficult for them to win re-election in 2012.

Experts’ early looks at Census estimates point to a potential new congressional district in northwest Harris County. That could be alluring to state Sen. Dan Patrick, R-Houston, who represents the area in the Legislature.

Read the rest.

UPDATE:  R.G. Ratcliffe has updated his story and posted a map showing the population growth in Texas between 2000 and 2008.

More
Tags: , , ,   |  Posted under Redistricting  |  Comments  1 Comment
Last Updated on Friday, 12 March 2010 02:32

From the Associated Press.

Members of Congress may soon be back in the business of raising soft money, the unlimited corporate and union donations that a 2002 law bans them from collecting for their campaigns.

The National Democratic Redistricting Trust is asking the Federal Election Commission to let lawmakers raise soft money for the legal fights likely to develop as congressional district boundaries are redrawn after this year’s census. How a district is drawn — and which voters are included in it — can have a big impact on whether a Democrat or Republican gets elected to represent it.

Read the rest.

More
Last Updated on Friday, 5 March 2010 08:15

From the Legislative Gazette.

As the 10-year redistricting process for New York draws near, more attention is being paid to proposals for improving the process used to determine how Senate, Assembly and congressional district lines are drawn in the state.

Last week the Nelson Rockefeller Institute of Government and the League of Women Voters held a forum in Albany to discuss legislative redistricting.

The panel, which consisted of Assemblyman Daniel Burling, R-Warsaw; Assemblyman William Parment, D-North Harmony; counsel to Sen. Martin Malave Dilan, D-Brooklyn, Jeffrey Wice; Blair Horner, New York Public Interest Research Group legislative director; and Gerald Benjamin, who was named a distinguished professor of political science and now serves as director of the SUNY New Paltz Center for Regional Research Education and Outreach, pointed out different ways to make redistricting more fair.

Horner indicated support for a Senate bill (S.1614) sponsored by David Valesky, D-Oneida, that would amend the state legislative law to create an 11-member reapportionment commission. The leaders of the minority and majority conferences in both house of the Legislature would name eight of those members. Each leader would get two appointments. Those members, in turn, would appoint the other three people, one of whom would serve as chair of the commission.

Read the rest…

More
Last Updated on Tuesday, 16 February 2010 11:49

From the Washington Times.

Prison populations have historically been included in national head counts, but now census officials will make data on inmate populations available to states earlier than in the past.

This change will allow states to decide whether to count inmates for purposes of redistricting. If a state makes that choice, it would have to decide where inmates should be considered residents – in rural towns, where prisons are often built, or in cities, where many prisoners come from.

Small tweaks in census figures can have large consequences, determining, for instance, which states get or lose an extra seat in the House of Representatives and how tax money is doled out between jurisdictions within a state.

Until now, the U.S. Census Bureau provided breakdowns on group quarters, like prisons, only after states had finished their redistricting. That resulted in districts with prisons getting extra representation in their legislatures, despite laws in some states that say a prison cell is not a residence.

The jockeying is all part of a decennial rite – counting the population. The federal government relies on the census not only to learn about Americans and their lives but also to parcel out federal dollars. As required by the Constitution, the census also is used to determine the number of House seats representing each state.

Read the rest…

More
Last Updated on Tuesday, 16 February 2010 08:07